A report by the British Library and the Research Information Network (RIN) provides insight into how information is used by researchers across life sciences.
Undertaken by Edinburgh University's Institute for the Study of Science, Technology and Innovation, the UK Digital Curation Centre and Edinburgh's University's Information Services, the report concludes that 'one-size-fits-all' information and data sharing policies are not achieving scientifically productive and cost-efficient information use in life sciences.
The report, Patterns of Information Use and Exchange: Case Studies of Researchers in Life Sciences was developed using an approach that captured the day-to-day patterns of information use in seven research teams from a range of disciplines, from botany to clinical neuroscience.
The study, undertaken over 11 months and involving 56 participants, found that there is a significant gap between how researchers behave and the policies and strategies of funders and service providers.
This suggests that the attempts to implement such strategies have had only a limited impact.
Key findings from the report include: researchers use informal and trusted sources of advice from colleagues, rather than institutional service teams, to help identify information sources and resources; the use of social networking tools for scientific research purposes is far more limited than expected; data and information sharing activities are mainly driven by needs and benefits perceived as most important by life scientists rather than 'top-down' policies and strategies; and there are marked differences in the patterns of information use and exchange between research groups active in different areas of the life sciences, reinforcing the need to avoid standardised policy approaches.
The study used research methods to map information use in research teams from across the life sciences.
This included specially designed 'information lab books' to chart and monitor individual researchers' day-to-day information practices.
The report sets out a number of recommendations to funders, universities and information service providers on how policy and services can be more aligned with research practice and help UK life scientists sustain their position at the forefront of world-class research.
